I watched this programme yesterday-
Dr Francesca Stavrakopoulou goes on the trail of the Biblical King David and his fabled empire. A national hero and icon for the Jewish people, and a divine king for Christians, David is best known as the boy-warrior who defeated the Philistine giant Goliath. As king, he united the tribes of Israel. But did he really rule over a vast Israelite kingdom? Did he even exist?
Stavrakopoulou visits key archaeological excavations where ground-breaking finds are being unearthed, and examines evidence for and against the Biblical account of King David. She explores the former land of the Philistines, home of the giant Goliath, and ruins in the north of Israel and in old Jerusalem itself purporting to be remains of David’s empire.
Interesting enough- although not without it’s irritations.
Lots of lingering shots of the lovely Dr Stavrakopoulou striding through various Biblical scenes and staring wistfully into the distant past. Wearing, rather oddly, the same clothes throughout.
The point of the programme was to ask some questions of the Biblical story of King David from an archaeological point of view, and to consider the vested interests that have effectively over-interpreted evidence in the past.
Not a lot of this was news really- Christians and Jews all want a piece of David. Christians have a clear for the stories of David to be seen in terms of a Biblical timeline, leading directly to Jesus. Modern day Israel sees David as representative of their hold and claim on the land- the glorious figurehead of their ancient history whose conquests and battles cleared the way for a golden age.
Except, despite the best efforts of 50 years of archaeology, there is very little evidence that he ever existed, and even more puzzling, very little evidence of complex urban society from the 10th Century. Although the debate rages on about this.
Stavrakopoulou obviously believes that King David is a mythological figure- akin to King Arthur, the product of longing emerging from a defeated and enslaved nation in the long generations of exile to come.
As I watched the programme, I found myself in a familiar place- asking myself what this might mean for my faith. What if she was right?
But perhaps surprisingly, I found myself rather disinterested in her argument and her conclusions. Firstly, the stories of David are so real and vital- so rich in human frailties and failure as well as success- that I have no problem in believing that he existed, even if the construction of the history around him- the mythology around him- has been shaped by successive generations of storytellers.
And I realised too how far I have come on this faith journey. I have no need of objective proof emerging from archaeology or charismatic phenomenology- in fact I am rather suspicious of both.
God is found in the small things.
Even in me.
Vodpod videos no longer available.