TransFORM- missional community formation…

Look past the impossibly hip language, and plethora of piercings friends, as this stuff could spell the future of church- particularly this side of the Atlantic.

Check out what is all about here.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “TransFORM- missional community format…“, posted with vodpod

 

Jim Crow laws, and a painted rock…

jim crow rock- from flickr

Photo by Scott Adams- http://www.flickr.com/photos/10021898@N02/797575782/in/photostream

On the shore a few hundred yards from where I live, is this rock.

It has probably been there since the last ice age, but at some point in the last 150 years someone thought that the point on one side looked like a beak so painted it black and began to call it ‘Jim Crow’. Quite who this was, and what the thinking behind the name was all about is unknown.

In June of this year there was much local controversy as someone painted over the decorations in the rock, restoring it to a natural stone colour. As far as we could tell, this seemed to be a protest against the symbolic meaning of a rock called ‘Jim Crow’. Here is the Dunoon Observers (somewhat partisan) take on the story at the time.

There was much debate as to what should be done about the rock- should it be repainted, or would it be better used as a different kind of community installation- perhaps decorated by different schools once a year…

However before this could be taken any further, someone had repainted the rock in its original colours.

So what is all the fuss about?

Well, the origins of the words ‘Jim Crow’ are pretty dreadful to most post modern sensibilities.

As far back as the middle of the 19th Century, ‘Jim Crow’ was a pejorative negative stereotype of people of Africanjim crow origin. ‘Jump Jim Crow‘ was a popular song and dance routine performed by white men with black faces in 1828 in the USA. The minstrel shows that began in this time became popular all over the world- and would certainly have spread to the music halls catering for day trippers ‘doon the watter’ towards the end of the Victorian era.

The words ‘Jim Crow’ were used as a description of black people at this time- in the same way that others would use ‘Nigger’ or ‘Sambo’.

But the infamy attached to the words was just beginning.

Following the widescale freeing of slaves following the American Civil war, the politics of the Southern states gradually returned to the Conservative whites, and from the 1870’s, a whole series of ‘segregation’ laws were enacted. These were known collectively simply as ‘the Jim Crow Laws’.

The effect of these laws on black Americans in the first half of the 20th Century has been well documented. It took the great struggles for freedom of the 60’s and 70’s to break their power.

There is a sample of the scope and extent of the laws here.

People fought and died over these issues, and for many the struggle against prejudice and narrow judgementalism continues.

JimCrow56

jim crow 2

So, back to our little rock in Dunoon.

I have heard it said that the name of the rock comes from the fact that there used to be a local joiners yard owned by Jim Crow opposite the rock. I doubt this myself, but in any case, the words ‘Jim Crow’ had too much resonance in the past to ever have been  neutral or value free, and the decoration on the rock is just too black-and-white-minstrel.

As you can see from here , there are strong opinions locally. One argument goes something like this;

Jim Crow is a local landmark- which has been there for over 100 years, and has nothing to do with racism.

The only people who have a problem with it are ‘incomers’ who have no connection to Dunoon.

For many years we had an American Navy base here, with lots of black sailors. No one ever protested about the rock.

It is a harmless much loved piece of local tradition, and should be left just as it is.

a_Jim_Crow_1905

Jim Crow on a photo dated 1905

But the sight of the rock, golliwogged up in garish new paint has always troubled me. I believe that where tradition and culture are in league with prejudice, then it is time to take a closer look at what we actually want to base our local tradition upon.

It’s symbolism may be obscure, but it is no less potent when set alongside recent American history.

I hear that the matter has been discussed in Scottish parliament, and there may yet be further scrutiny of the matter.

Get rid I say.

Persian poetry 3- Rumi…

rumi-meditating

So, we come to Rumi.

He was the only poet I had sort of heard of when I began reading this wonderful old poetry. I knew of him as an almost alien mystic, but once again, the beauty of his words seem to reach over the centuries, and become a bridge over the religious/cultural divides that we still build up high. There is such depth of humanity in this poetry that it deserves to be so much better known in the West.

So who was this man Rumi?

His full name was Jalāl ad-Dīn Muḥammad Balkhi and it seems we know a lot about his life, despite the 800 year odd years that have passed since he was born. Many of his letters have survived (as many as 147 personal letters) and he was revered in his own lifetime, and so people recorded his words and wisdom.

We know that he had a famous father, who was a poet and learned man in his own right. We also know he was born around 1207 during turbulent times, as the Mongol hordes where slashing and burning their way across the known world, and pushing back the edges of what had been the great Seljuq empire which split into small Emerates.

Rumi was thought to have been born in Balkh, an ancient city in what is now Afghanistan- previously a melting pot of religious ideas- first a centre for Zoroastrian thought, later Buddhism but by the time of Rumi, Islam was in the ascendant.

Rumi’s family fled the advancing Mongols in the nick of time, traveling west, first performing the Hajj and eventually settling in the Anatolian city Konya (capital of the Seljuk Sultanate of Rum, now located in Turkey.

The story of his life goes something like this-

Rumi follows in his fathers footsteps- becoming a scholar at the University in Konya, and eventually his fame as a poet and learned man spread.

At the height of his success, he encountered a Sufi called Shams-e-Tabrīzī. This meeting changed his life. Everything that he counted as worthwhile- success, wealth, position- all this was suddenly called into question by what he saw in the poverty and simplicity of the life of the wandering Sufi.

He started neglecting his public duties and following after his new friend. The association brought him ridicule and so he was forced to resign his job, and then began a 4 year friendship with Shams.

Then one day, as suddenly as he came into Rumi’s life, his friend disappeared. Some say he was murdered by one of Rumi’s sons, perhaps embarrassed and resentful of the hold this raggedy man had over his father. Others said that he traveled East for new adventures. Rumi spent years looking for him.

Rumi’s life from this time was dedicated to a deep spirituality. For him, the human condition was empty, like a reed plucked from the bank of a river, and cut to form a flute. Life might make holes in the flute through to its hollow centre, but unless the reed was filled with the breath of the Beloved, then it would be for ever empty. So the purpose of life was to journey back to union with Beloved, from whom we have been cut off.

A craftsman pulled a reed from the reedbed
cut holes in it, and called it a human being.

Since then it has been wailing a tender agony
of parting, never mentioning the skill
that gave it life as a flute.

Although a devout Muslim, the journey of the Sufi according to Rumi, was to be encountered in personal experience- not in abstract doctrine and creed. Some of his ideas would seem to sit well within universalist ideas of faith. For example-

I searched for God among the Christians and on the Cross and therein I found Him not.
I went into the ancient temples of idolatry; no trace of Him was there.
I entered the mountain cave of Hira and then went as far as Qandhar but God I found not.
With set purpose I fared to the summit of Mount Caucasus and found there only ‘anqa’s habitation.
Then I directed my search to the Kaaba, the resort of old and young; God was not there even.
Turning to philosophy I inquired about him from ibn Sina but found Him not within his range.
I fared then to the scene of the Prophet’s experience of a great divine manifestation only a “two bow-lengths’ distance from him” but God was not there even in that exalted court.
Finally, I looked into my own heart and there I saw Him; He was nowhere else.

Rumi believed that we could encounter the Beloved through dance, music, art and of course- poetry. After his death others formed an order of Sufi’s that came to be known as the Whirling Dervishes, because of their wild ecstatic dancing, and regarded him as their spiritual father.

He died in 1273 and a shrine still stands over his grave in Konya-

Rumi's tomb, Konya

Time for some more poetry-

The first one is thought to relate to friendship. It makes me think of campfire on dark nights on island trips with friends-

We point to the new moon

This time when you and I sit here, two figures
with one soul. we’re a garden,
with plants and birdsong moving through us
Like rain

The stars come out. We’re out
of ourselves, but collected. We point
to the new moon, its discipline and slender joy.

We don’t listen to stories
full of frustrated anger. We feed
On laughter and tenderness
we hear around us
when we are together.

And even more incredible, sitting here in Konya
we’re this moment in Khorasan and Iraq.

We have these forms in time
and another in the elsewhere
that’s made of this closeness

Say who I am

I am dust particles in sunlight
I am the round sun.

To the bits of dust I say, stay.
To the sun, keep moving.

I am morning mist,
And the breathing of evening.

I amwind in the top of a grove
and surf on the cliff.

Mast, rudder, helmsman and keel.
I am also the coral reef they founder on.

I am a tree with a trained parot in its branches.
Silence, thought and voice.

The musical air coming through a flute
A spark off a stone, a flickering
in metal. Both candle
and the moth crazy around it.

Rose and the nightingale
lost in the fragrance.

I am all orders of being, the circling galaxy,
the evolutionary intelligence, the lift
and the falling away. What is
and what isn’t.

Hold: this space- new site…

Congratulations to Cheryl and friends down under on their lovely new site– looks great!

Loads of alt worship stuff, and lovely writing…

This is on their front page-

Take the clay of our lives and shape it to love
Take the clay of the church and shape it to grace
Take the clay of the world and shape it to peace
Take the clay of today and shape it to hope

And then breathe your spirit into all
again

For ever and ever
Amen

Blonde

CIMG1460

My daughter Emily is clever.

Clever in the get-her-sums-right kind of way. And also in a see-the-stuff-below-the-surface socially aware kind of way.

I am VERY proud of her. She is 13 going on 35 and in every way wonderful.

But- she is also rather… blonde.

Now I am not into judgmental stereotyping of folks as a result of outward appearance- it is against everything I stand for. But sometimes,  I wonder.

There are lots and lots of blonde jokes out there- the sorts of things that everyone finds funny (unless you happen to be blonde that is…)

For example-

So earlier, I was talking to Emily about Kuala Lumpar, and she asked me if it was in Spain. Fair enough- many of us would struggle to be sure about the whereabouts of Kuala Lumpar (Malaysia by the way- for the Blondes amongst us.)

When I rather harshly chuckled at the possible Spanish connection, and asked her what city she thought might be the capital of Spain, she replied ‘Portugal?’

Again rather unkindly, I laughed, and suggested that that would be like saying that France is the capital of Germany, she said ‘Oh right- and they are not even close to one another are they?’

I corrected her about the location of these European neighbours, and then told her that Madrid was the capital of Spain.

‘Oh right’ she said ‘I thought Madrid was a football team.’

On the other hand, perhaps she has a blonde geography teacher…

Benmore and the restored Fernery

IMGP6427

We took a walk around the gardens at Benmore yesterday.

The colours that can be seen in the tree collections are astonishing at this time of year- and of course there is the Fernery- a recently restored folly half way up a cliff, housing a collection of rare ferns. It is such a lovely space- and makes me think of my friend Simon McGoo- he would love it.

So for his and your benefit- a few photographs…

Sharon Shoesmith- trial by media…

Sharon-Shoesmith-leaves-t-001

Sharon Shoesmith is in the news again. check out this piece from the Guardian which describes some of the twistings and turnings  in the lead up to her sacking.

I have written several pieces about the event in Haringey around the tragic death of a baby called Peter at the hands of her mother and two men, whilst under supervision of the social work department. (See here and here for example.)

Shoesmith was paid a lot of money to manage a complex and pressured social care system for children. Her performance was regarded as exemplary- in bringing positive change in a council not unfamiliar with scandal. She had the full support of experts, local political leaders, and her own staff- that is until a poor performance at a press conference in front of tabloid journalists baying for blood. Blood that was duly served up.

You could say that a leader of a system that fails has to take the consequences.

But again I find myself asking questions of a society that appoints social workers to care for it’s most needy and vulnerable members, then vilifies the profession at every opportunity, whilst at the same time, services remain underfunded, and undervalued.

And there is a chronic shortage of staff who are willing to place themselves in the firing line as social workers doing child protection.

It remains to be seen as to whether Sharon Shoesmith will win her case in the High Court. But many people will hope that out of this process will come some clarity, and debate over the real issues.

Because the idea that kids die in our country because of a bad set of professionals not doing their job properly- it may sell tabloids, but it will not protect children.

Two young girls jump to their deaths…

erskine bridge

Along the Clyde from where we live is a bridge over the river, connecting Paisley to Erskine, and therefore known as the Erskine bridge.

It is notorious as a spot where people go to commit suicide.

So much so that there are four telephone boxes on the bridge with information about the Samaritans helpline service.

And yesterday, two young girls, aged 14 and 15, left the residential educational unit they lived in, stood on the parapet, held hands, and jumped off together.

Soon the fingers of blame will be pointed. Something surely should have been done to avoid this terrible waste of life?

But for now, the shock will be on families, friends and care workers.

My heart goes out to them all.

BBC iPlayer – Transatlantic Sessions: Series 3: Episode 2

I am just sitting with a glass of wine, flicking between the cricket (we might actually win this one!) and the sublime ‘transatlantic sessions’ on BBC4.

A long weekend beckons, with plans to canoe and camp, and I have just eaten well with my lovely wife.

Life does not get much better, so I thought I would share the love…

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Oppression, freedom and homosexuality…

stonewall riots

How far we have travelled…

There was a really interesting programme on Radio 4 this morning- part of the ‘Reunion’ series. This is the blurb from the website-

Sue MacGregor presents the series which reunites a group of people intimately involved in a moment of modern history.

Sue Lawley brings together the men and women who founded the gay rights campaign group, Stonewall. She is joined by Sir Ian McKellen, Matthew Parris, Lisa Power, Michael Cashman and Olivette Cole-Wilson.

In 1989 a small group joined forces in a campaign against a law now known as Section 28. This law banned councils from ‘promoting homosexuality’ or ‘promoting the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship’.

The gay rights scene at the time was radical and activist and there were no campaign groups engaging both gay men and lesbians together. Stonewall aimed to create a professional lobbying group that would fight against the discrimination of lesbians, gay men and bisexuals. Dubbed Stonewall to signal doggedness and to commemorate the New York riots in which gay protestors had fought back against police brutality two decades before, it called for full legal rights, which still seemed a loony-left pipe dream.

Stonewall’s moderate tone attracted criticism from more radical veterans of the gay rights movement, but also lent its advocates greater media respectability and a hearing from government ministers.

Since its inception, Stonewall has led the way with an impressive number of reforms, pressing ministers and taking test cases to court. These reforms include the repeal of Section 28, equalising the age of consent, permitting civil partnerships and overturning the ban on gays in the military. Another legacy has been to allow gay and lesbian politicians into the mainstream – not just demanding equal rights, but as representatives of the wider community.

You can listen again to the discussion- here.

I remember the time in the 80’s when Stonewall were starting to be listened to by the media. I was part of a Christian community who were at best uncomfortable with homosexuality- and at worst rabidly condemning and judgemental towards anyone who ‘came out. Even the most liberal of us who were uncomfortable with the hard doctrine, would have thought that homosexuality was just plain WRONG. Unbiblical. Against the laws of God. Sin.

Listening now to what the protestors were subjected to- I am ashamed.

Why were Christians not standing in the streets alongside these brave campaigners?

Because no matter what your theology, our greatest call is not to condemn people for their private sin, but to stand with the oppressed and the marginalised.

Isn’t it?

Listen to the programme, and I invite you to imagine twenty thirty years into the future, and wonder what people of faith will make of this matter then. Ask how this will compare with other civil rights battles fought in the 20th Century…