Nationalism versus indigineity…

All this flag waving makes me feel deeply uncomfortable – disturbed even – and I have been trying to get a handle on why it affects me so much.

The latest version began as a right-wing ‘take our country back’ surge in England. It is easy to condemn it as barely disguised racism. I have written before about how it has been playing out in my place of birth in Nottinghamshire, urged on by local Reform MP Lee Anderson. It has become a toxic contagion, celebrating division but fueled by disaffection and a deep sense of injustice amongst working people who have been bombarded with stories and ideas that scapegoat and victimise excluded groups.

It makes me feel ill, but there is a disturbance beyond that about naitonalism itself.

A few years ago – around the time of the rise of the Scottish National Party and the referendum on Scottish independence – I went to listen to a talk at Greenbelt festival. The speaker outlined a clever, provocative argument for nationalism being a kind of God-ordained goodness, drawing on biblical stories like the Tower of Babel and the way that Israel was chosen as special. Something inside me rebelled and I walked out before the end. Again, why was I so disturbed?

Surely there is indeed a good nationalism – proud nations that are a force for good, who welcome refugees and embrace them in their new homes? After all, I live in Scotland, so what did I find so difficult?

There is also this rather revealing question – Is any expression of caution or disquiet at the Scottish version of nationalism ever acceptable from an incomer like me? I have only rarely experienced direct anti-English hatred, but it is always there, just below the surface. This is quite understandable given our shared history in these lands, and the sense of unjustice felt in those parts not English, but let us not pretend that hatred is good, or that the sense of victimhood and tribalism it unleashes is healthy.

It is no accident that nationalism rises up in times of economic depression and difficulty because it has always been that way. It has so often been a political force used to galvanise mass movements against a feared other, either inside our outside the borders, or both. I know there are other much more positive versions of nationalism, based on pride and shared values, but can we point to a single version that was not in some way defined against the other?

I must be clear that sometimes nations or peoples have a legitimate struggle for freedom against oppression. Nationalism here becomes a rallying call – albeit a dangerous one. Many colonised nations have been forced to make that journey, and many in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales see themselves in the same place – struggling for freedom against an English colonial power. I hear that argument, but am not fully convinced by it. Colonial power, such as they still exist, are no longer bordered, they have become corporate. They serve the interests of a wealthy elite, not a crown. You do not fight this kind of colonialism by re-flagging it.

I think I walked out of that talk because Jesus was not Scottish, or English, or American. Those whom Jesus is recorded as being most angry with were the religious nationalists from his own nation so how dare we presume to co-opt him to a our national cause? The Biblical nationalists wanted a politcal messiah, not an advocate for the poorest and most broken. Certainly not one that pointed at the feared other and said we should love them – even the Romans invaders. Even the Samaritan apostates. Even the English. His solution was clearly NOT to proclaim a national revolution, but an entirely different kind of cross-border subversive nation called theKingdom of God.

I should perhaps interject here that I am not talking about the nation state as an organisational unit, with tax power, social and welfare policies, justice systems and housing provision. I believe strongly in a civic exchange of rights between individual and state, which shapes our national and individual wellbeing. The role of the state in this vision of nationhood is not to disappear (behind the glorious rise of free market capitalism for example) but rather to be the place where the national good is carefully negotatiated and legislated. It is messy, full of compromise but (we hope) there is a progression based on the value of humanity and a desire to preserve the land in all its beauty and variety. It is quite possible that a smaller nation such as Scotland, set free from the clutches of a greater Britain could achieve these things more effectively. If so, bring it on.

Human civilisations have been around for hundreds of thousands of years, whereas nation states as we might understand them now, are an invention of the last few hundred years. When we define ourselves by our nationalism – often citing ancient precident – we mostly delude ourselve, and apply selective historical analysis. We tend to look at this kind of nationalism through the lens given to us be someone else who is using it to persuade, to sell, to co-opt us to their vision of the world. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but we should at least call it what it is.

Neither let us not pretend that nationalism is just about sensible self direction of economic or social policies. It always contains other, darker things too- perhaps only visible to outsiders, to edge walkers and poets. Boundaries look both outwards and inwards.

Photo by Adrien Olichon on Pexels.com

Perhaps my discomfort is also about my own somewhat confused national make-up. I was born in England, but had an Irish father and now live in Scotland. I have always found identity hard to define or own. This seems less to do with where my parents were from and more to do with my sense of being an outsider. My troubled background was never likely to gift me with a sense of belonging. There are many others just like me. When the flags go up and people get teary-eyed and start to shout-sing their anthems, we shrink inside.

I say this not to claim any victimhood – after all, I am a white, middle-class sis male. All the world belongs to me and my kind, so this really is not a just me puffing up my privilege.

The point here is to consider how nationalism draws lines on the land that cut between people. Nationalism is a way to look at the land and also at those who are on it and outside it. Even the more positive forms of nationalism – those which celebrate a place and pride in a shared heritage – have a shadow side, in that we tend to defind ourselves against other nations, other peoples. It becomes a way to simplify and stereotype, and what might seem benign can easily turn into something more unpleasant.

There is more though. I tried to express some of what I was feeling in this poem.

Nationality

I don’t believe in borders
Or the tyranny of maps
I fear the way they fence us in
And split the white from black
So I will not raise up Saltires
Nor wave the Union Jack
I will not sing those angry songs
My troops will not attack

What makes us what we are?
Whose stories are we telling?
What mix of blood pumps through these veins?
Whose products are we selling?
What shades of grey do we convey?
Whose history compelling?
Who pipes the tunes, who reads the runes?
In whose land are we dwelling?

Send them out then bring them home
Let roads be laid wide open
This way of love, the pilgrim path
Requires walls to be broken
Then we lay down in fold of ground
Where soil is warm and welcome
The crops we sow must surely grow
For the rains fill up the ocean

Perhaps we can turn now to another word. Here it is, with the dictionary definition – and as it is often used by a certain kind of flag waver. (Along with other words like ‘Judeo-Christian’ and ‘shared culture’.)

indigenous
/ɪnˈdɪdʒɪnəs/
adjective
1.originating or occurring naturally in a particular place; native.
“coriander is indigenous to southern Europe”
2. (of people) inhabiting or existing in a land from the earliest times or from before the arrival of colonists.
“she wants the territorial government to speak with Indigenous people before implementing a programme”

By strict application of this definition, I can never fully ‘belong’ to the place where I live. I can never say without qualification that I am ‘from’ there. I am always an incomer, a wanderer, an immigrant. Recently, I heard a different use of the word that felt very important. This came from Brian McLaren, during a talk he gave in Iona Abbey. He said something like this;

There are two kinds of people in this world- indiginous people and colonisers, but you can choose which one you want to be.

I know, I know there are all sorts of problems with this simplistic dialectical statement- not least that it seems to imply that I could impose my belonging in a way that sounds like colonialism, but in the context of his words they sang clear. He was talking about the way the Bible has been defined, decoded (or perhaps encoded) and packaged by colonisers, but if you look again at the stories and people inside it, they are all in fact about people who have been colonised. In fact, the Bible is better to be understood as the record of oppressed colonised people trying to make sense of their lives and what the divine meant in a colonised context. I could say a lot more about this, but for now, let me just describe what this meant to me.

If Brian is right, I can choose to live as an inigenous person, seeking deep connection to the place where I live, to the people where I live and to the land and non-human occupiers of this land. I do not need to be invited or embraced politically or legally – I just need to learn to listen to the land and love it.

The invitation was always there. Even when I felt like a stranger. I say this because I have come to beleive that at the heart of everything that is and ever was is God, and she was always waiting with love.

In accepting this invitation to become indigenous, I also resist the pull towards colonial domination and exploitation. I try to live simply and in harmony. I try to listen rather than tell. I seek to forgive what I can, even in myself – even when I fail in my attempt to become indigenous.

I start where I am, right here. I try to offer hospitality to all who also arrive here, in the same way that the earth welcomes me.

I also look beyond the borders of my land and imagine a world in which there was no border, just people who are loved, and people who have not yet learned that this was always what their land was calling them to.

New Proost poetry podcast with Kenneth Steven…

The other day I had the great pleasure of making a journey into deep Argyll, over Loch Fyne by ferry (whilst it was still dark) then up to the Isle of Seil, to meet with poet, novelist and artist Kenneth Steven. The pretext of this visit was to record a podcast, but the truth is, it was about time we met! Two blokes, both about the same age, both living in Argyll, both writing poetry inspired by the spirituality of wild places – oh and we have connection to Iona and the Iona community too. How was it that we did not already know each other?

Kenneth and his wife Kristina were the perfect hosts- despite an earlier failed attempt to record over the internet which I messed up by getting the time wrong! They live in a beautiful place and I very much enjoyed our chat. We hope you do too!

You can listen on Spotify, Apple or Youtube – Here is the spotify link;

If you don’t already know Kenneth’s work, here is the blurb from his website.

Kenneth Steven is first and always a poet. To survive as a ⁠literary author⁠ he’s had to become many other things as a writer – he translated the Norwegian novel The Half Brother, he’s a children’s picture book and story writer, he’s an essayist and a feature writer – but it’s poetry and the love of poetry that lies at the heart of it all. His volume of selected poems Iona appeared from Paraclete Press in the States a couple of years ago. His numerous collections have sold many thousands of copies, and he has a strong name as a poet thanks to the poetry-related features he’s written and presented over long years: his programme A Requiem for St Kilda having won a Sony Gold for Radio 4.

His poetry has been inspired primarily by place. He grew up on the edge of the Scottish Highlands with a profound awareness of that world: his mother’s people were Gaelic speakers from Wester and Easter Ross. It’s the wildscape of Highland Scotland that pours through his pen.

It’s that same wildscape he seeks to capture as a ⁠painter⁠. He and his wife Kristina live on the Scottish west coast, and it’s the ever-changing colours of sea and sky he loves so much: the myriad blues and the incredible beauty of the light.

Kenneth runs his own podcast, available to those who support his work through patreon- we very much encourage any of you who are able to reach out. We need out poets more than ever!

You can connect with the wonderful ⁠Imagining Things podcast here.⁠

Kenneth’s website with links to many of his books and paintings that are available⁠ is here.

The second death of my father…

Seamus, Stephen and me.

I am just back from Ireland and the funeral of my father, Seamus Goan, aged 86. I am still rather dumbfounded that the Catholic priest who led his short funeral (not a mass) at the funeral home refused permission to allow anyone else to contribute to the service in the form of reading a eulogy or even a poem. I contemplated ignoring him and speaking anyway but this seemed like an agressive act that was not the way to send anyone off. I decided in the end that I would tell the story my way, via this blog. I am very tired after yesterday’s ten hour journey, but as ever, I process best by writing so here I am once more looking at a white screen, fingers poised.

Where to begin? How do you tell the story of a life – particularly when I only know most of it through snatched stories and second-hand memories?

Behind the wheel of an Austin A30, around 1965

The first death of my father happened before I was old enough to form memories. His marriage to my mother was always problematic and at some point he disappeared, leaving a well of bitterness for my mother to swim in. She raised two children on benefits, struggling with her own mental health, and I grew up with a constant diet of stories about my father that could not have been less flattering. Some of the grim and uncomfortable facts of this early part of his life were without dispute, but I aways knew that my mother was not a reliable witness. My late sister was older than me, and had memories of him that she always cherished – we always knew there was more to this story. It would take almost 40 years for me to start looking for the rest.

Me in yellow (with the bowl cut) back row, around 1975

The next part of this story leaps forward to the early 1990’s. We had been invited to a friends house in Blackburn, Lancashire and I was sitting in her book-lined living room whilst she finished cooking. Idly, I picked up the telephone directory and flicked to the G section to see if there were any Goans listed – something that I had often done before, with no previous success – it is an unusual name, after all. This time however, there they were- four or five telephone numbers, with addresses, each a different Goan household.

(Incidentally, the name Goan has nothing to do with Goa. Our best guess is that it is a derivitive of Gowan, or McGowan, meaning Smith or son of Smith. Somewhere way back in my ancestry, they were working with metal. But back to the story….)

Seeing these names in the Blackburn telephone directory triggered a distant memory. As a child, we used to recieve gifts from an uncle and aunt in a place called… Blackburn.

I did nothing with this information for a while, as I was not sure what to do with the knowledge. I spoke to my sister, who was tantalised and immobilised in equal measure. I said nothing to my mother. Eventually the pressure was too great, and I wrote to Mr J Goan, asking if he might be who I thought he was. Mr John Goan wrote back, and he was indeed my Uncle. I remember the nervous drive over – little Emily was sick en route, forcing a detour to buy new clothes. I remember kindness, but awkward conversations, a sense of profoundly disconnected lives and the impossibility of questions or answers. I remember meat sandwiches, which I ate despite being a vegetarian. I remember not knowing what to do next, so asking my Uncle and Aunt not to let my father know I had been in touch – a request that they graciously honoured, as it turned out, for many years.

The years passed because of my own uncertaintly, but also I did not think I could take the next step alone, because even if I could keep a secret from my mother, I could not from my sister, and it was hard to draw her out into the adventure. We had both lived with the absence, but for her it had been invested with the possibility that one day our father would return and ‘rescue’ her from the difficulties of our childhood. When this never happened, meeting him as an adult was the end to her childhood escape fantasy.

The story then moves forward another ten years or so, during which (largely unknown to me) Michaela had stayed in touch with my Aunt Betty in Blackburn, quietly keeping the channel open for future connection. By then we had moved to Scotland and life was different. It seemed important to keep pushing outwards, to let the expansion continue. I can’t remember exactly what made me finally take the plunge, except that I hit the age of 40, and it seemed like now or never, with sister or not. I had no real expectations or hopes, just the feeling that there was an integrity in reconnection, even if this might lead to unknown difficulties.

I sent a letter to an address in Strabane, Ireland and three days later, my father called on the telephone. His accent was so thick I struggled to understand, but it was clear he was very glad to be speaking. More than this, he told me that my brother Stephen and his wife Kate were also living in Scotland, only about an hour from us.

In the end it was Steve and Kate (and their son Jamie) whom we met first. We greeted them from the ferry, little Emily standing back in suspicion, the two boys instantly playing together, the rest of us starting to map things we shared and would always be different.

My parent’s wedding, Sutton-in-Ashfield, 1965. (My mother had to leave her job at Boots chemist shop as married women were not allowed to work there.)

My first meeting with my father was part of a trip to Ireland, during which we spent a couple of days in their tiny flat. We drove together to the Giant’s Causway, and spoke at tangents.

It was obvious from the start that I was my father’s son. We looked alike. Our temperaments were similar- a certain shy reticence. Introversion. In other ways we were very different. My life had been about seeking respectability and safety. His had been an excercise in staying one step ahead of what he had left behind, at least at first. He used different names- even to the end of his life. He spent time in prison. My mother’s bitter condemnations (of both of us) rang out loud.

On that trip to the Giant’s Causeway, the conversation was sparse, and consisted of my asking lots of neutral questions, followed by short answers and long slightly uncomfortable silences. When we arrived at our destination, I took the kids off to scramble over the hexagonal stones whilst Michaela walked along the upper shoreline with my father and his partner Peggy. In that journey, he spoke much more freely to Michaela – it seemed easier for him to talk to women. She was unable to understand most of what he was saying, but there is only a limited number of times you can ask for repetition. At the end of one long monologue, my father said “So can you pass that on to Chris for me please.” He had been unburdening himself and making some kind of explanation, and she had heard very little of it. I never managed to find out exactly what he had to say in that conversation.

Inevitably, over the next 18 years or so, I began to piece together the story of his life, mostly not from him, but from conversations with Steve and other relatives. Here is what I know – it is not the whole truth and some might be not true at all, but it is the story I can tell.

Seamus Goan was born in Sion Mills, just outside Strabane, County Tyrone, in the province known as Northern Ireland, to Margaret and John, who worked at the flax mill that gave the town its name. He was one of five children who survived to adulthood – Michael, Molly, Gay, John and Seamus.

Flax Mills meant short lives for workers, who often contracted ‘brown lung disease’, and my grandmother died in 1947 when my father was eight years old, so he was brought up mostly by his older sisters Gay and Molly. My Grandfather died twelve years later, and somehow it seems that my father barely attended school and back then was unable to read or write.

As a young adult, he followed the exodus of Irish men and boys – and his brothers – over the Irish sea to England in order to find work – remember all those ‘no blacks, no Irish, no dogs’ signs that were placed outside ‘respectable’ guest houses? He found work on the construction of the new motorway system, and whilst working on the M1 being forced up through Nottinghamshire, he met my mother and they married.

My sister Katharine was born in 1966, then I came along in 1967. By then the wedding was already over. My mother raised me with stories of much of the bad that happened around that time. Gambling addiction and the stolen items to fund the betting from neighbours. The house empty of food or warmth and the bailifs at the door for unpaid bills. The fear and shame of this time never left her, unlike my father, who left and never came back – except that is not quite true, he knocked on the door some time in the mid 1980’s, but was given no welcome, so left before my sister or I knew who he was. I later found out that he sometimes drove his car to our street in order to catch glimpses of us, but we never met again as

He lived a life away from mine which I can only wonder at.

I know that at some point a few years after he left my life, he met Peggy and fell in love again. She was from a Protestant family, born out in the sticks outside Strabane so they made a mixed couple – something difficult to do in Ireland back when the troubles were still raging in the wild west border country of County Tyrone. (Strabane lost the greatest percentage of citizens to the violence of anywhere in the country) so they made a life for themselves in Cambridge.

Seamus was still working on various contruction projects – for a long time he was running gangs installing cables for cable TV. It seems he was always held back by illiteracy, leaving a job whenever this might be found out, mostly managing to cover it up and stay one step ahead of the shame. Later Seamus and Peggy ran a pub, working long hours.

During all of this they had two children- Stephen, then Sarah. Sarah was born with profound learning difficulties and it was her care than dominated family life for the next decades. From being an absent father, Seamus became as hands-on as it is possible to imagine.

If I am going to tell this story here, do I tell everything? There are dark sides to this story, which I was tempted to gloss over, but this does not feel honest, to the story we made together. My father was always ‘on the run’ in some way. He used the names of his brothers rather than his for many interactions with officialdom right up to the end of his life, for example. He went to prison for failing to pay maintenance. He never stopped the betting on horses and was most at home in a bar. At some point his new family was disrupted because he was jailed for faling to pay maintenance (not directly to us, but rather to offset the state benefits which my mother, sister and I existed on.) Money was always tight, always an issue. Steve and I have this in common, despte our different beginnings.

A man is never just one thing – we are many. We are capable of both good and bad. We are all redeemable. We can all grow and change. Steve told me that for most of his adult life, he had never passed his driving test (remember the interchangable name thing mentioned above) but then, as an older adult, he took it and passed it. Quite what they made of him turning up for the test I don’t know.

It seems he changed jobs frequently to avoid being shamed as illiterate, but around the time that we met, the same shame drove him to learn to read. He developed a taste for novels about cowboys.

By the time I met my father, he had moved back to Strabane, a place which had always been home to him – full of a network of family and friends that anchored his whole life. He was a regular attender at Mass and became that man who could always be relied upon to drive someone to hospital or go round to unblock a gutter, or deliver newspapers to those who were less mobile.

Meanwhile, he stayed in touch with friends and family in England too, often turning up wiht little or no warning in Scotland or England, having driven long distances seemingly on a whim, but always to see Sarah who was then living in supported accommodation in Cambridge.

My sister Katharine died.

May half sister Sarah died.

My mother died.

Peggy developed dementia, with Seamus as her carer. It was difficult at times, but he remained faithful. Once, after a difficult exchange, he created some panic as he left the house and booked himself in a hotel without telling anyone. Margaret, a family friend, found him and gave he a dressing down.

Then he developed dementia himself – revealed in irrational anger towards his landlord and some quite dramatic acts of confusion.

He left Peggy at one point and got on the ferry to come to England, but then disappeared. We had to report him missing, leading to police searches of all known addresses (including ours. There was a very funny moment when they opened our hoover cupboard and we imagined him standing there…) Eventully his numberplate was picked up by the cameras on the motorway system near Manchester, and Steve went over to bring him back. After this, his licence was revoked, but this did not stop the old pirate from buying another car – leading to Steve and I going over to Ireland to make some interventions…

First Peggy was persuaded to move into a nursing home in Strabane. Seamus was lonely, so eventually he followed. Steve, Kate, Michaela and I cleared out their home. They had very little and most things went ot charity shops. I constantly found myself comparing this process to that of clearing my mothers house, who had accumulated so very much. It felt unbearably sad at times, but perhaps this was another gift from my father- to learn that life is not measured by weight of posessions.

fixing a mower with my father, around 2013

I said none of this at the funeral, partly because of the religious ego that silenced any non-priestly voice, but also because it would have all been too much. I would have said something like this;

When I was a child, I was jealous of people who had ‘normal’ families. Mine was a mess.

When I got older, I realised that there was no such thing as a normal family.

Families form and fracture, like mine did, even before I could form memories of it.

It was perhaps harder for Seamus, losing his parents so young. It set him on a road that led to me.

It was hard too for Stephen and Sarah, learning to make their family work.

We know this – Despite the scars, fractures can mend.

I believe that this happens if we choose a path of love.  It will always take us home.

I want to read a poem that was read at both my mother’s and my sister’s funerals that talks about love as a deliberate decision, and the consequences that it might have.

It is also a prayer for my father.

Cupped

Practice the wound of love
Let it devastate
Let it scrape your soul
For blessed are the gentled
Blessed are the meek
Blessed are those whose fullness
Is now found empty

Practice the wound of love
Rest now in that broken place
Where grief is never silent
And ragged roots of love
Tap the trampled earth
Blessed are you as you reach for love
Because it reaches out for you

Practice the wound of love
Let it devastate
For nothing ever came from nothing
(Apart from love)
At the end of everything
We are just cups
Who are cupped.
We are held.

New proost poetry podcast with Samara Pitt…

One of the delightful things about our Proost project is that it enables us to walk the edges and find others that are doing the same. We try to gather some of this edge walking via our two podcasts- one that has a more general focus (and includes trying to do Proost ‘buisiness’ out in the open), the other one gathering poets and poetry- as this seems to have always been a strong and important strand of what we are about.

Today I was delighted to listen and share this conversation;

Where does poetry go? What is it for? How might it be used in the service of justice, peace and reconciliation? How does this relate to spirituality?

In this episode, our Talitha talks to the poet, musician and activist Samara Pitt about her practice, her songs and her love of words. In particular, she describes a process of turning poetry into song – an almost magical process…

Samara describes herself like this;

Samara is a 7th generation coloniser-inheritor living on the unceded land of the Wurundjeri Woirurrung people in the hills outside of Naarm/Melbourne.

She has lived and worked in several different intentional communities, most recently at Gembrook Retreat where the community invites people on to the land to encounter God in creation and to equip each other to live a soulful life.

She loves singing, singing with others, and putting music to words that help us listen more deeply to Country and to soul. Drawing on the liturgical tradition of sung refrains as a congregational response to the reading of a psalm, she has just started to compose short songs based on the repetition of short phrases, designed to help us dwell with the emotion and beauty of words and harmonies. They are also a grateful tribute and offering to the writers.

You can find more of Samara’s work – and support it – here.

Here is Samara’s account of her poetry choices for this episode.

Butterflies

Shaun Tan is one of my favourite writers and illustrators working in these lands now called Australia. His books are haunting and beautiful. and help me to look at the ordinary through the lens of wonder and imagination. This is taken from his book Tales from the Inner City which explores the mythic presence of the more-than-human world in the midst of our cities.

The hunger

The lyrics come from Kerri ní Dochartaigh’s book ‘Thin Places’, a mix of nature writing and Troubles memoir about growing up in in the midst of violence in Derry and the role of nature in helping her find peace and healing.

The halos and the rocks

Gout Gout is an up and coming Australian sprinter who gave the most poetic statement I’ve ever heard from an athlete in a press conference, when he was asked if he still feels normal. I found another slam poetry style quote from him about how he ‘steps light but presence heavy’, and then added my own line imagining the cycle of preparing for, running and coming down after races.

Turn towards the darkness

I found these lines in a book by Chris Anderson called ‘Light when it comes’. Based on the spiritual practice of ‘examen’, these words suggest that we turn to face darkness rather than flee from it.

The weaponisation of racist tropes – a long and inglorious history…

Over the weekend, over 300 people marched through my home town of Sutton-in-Ashfield in a protest against… well that is not quite clear. Immigration? Sexual assault of a minor? A hotel that might/might not be taking in asylum seekers? A loss of white male identity?

What we do know is that it all started with this post from the local MP, Lee Anderson.

There is so much about this post that is misinformation, intended to fuel a particular narrative. It worked.

There is a real question of whether Anderson broke the law in revealing this information – if indeed it is true. Truth Against Hate (an organisation that seeks to work against racist amd hate) puts it this way;

…the individual in question has been charged, which means the case is now active under UK law. That means public statements which risk prejudicing the trial could be in breach of the Contempt of Court Act 1981.

Anderson also links the case to immigration and asylum policy, which some legal experts say could inflame tensions or risk stirring up hostility. We are not accusing anyone of a crime, this post simply asks whether his actions are appropriate or lawful.

If you believe this should be looked into, you can report it to your local police or via the national service:

https://report-it.org.uk/your_police_force

This story has not been picked up (as far as I can see) by national news outlets – apart from a story in the Mail and the Express who have chosen to focus on the fact that a woman wearing a union jack dress was denied entry to a Wetherspoons pub in the middle of the town as police were trying to reduce tensions and alcohol intake. Of course, the right-wing red tops chose to depict this in a rather different kind of way.

As I watched the march unfolding via facebook, and messages from Michaela’s relatives who still live there, one thing that seemed obvious is that most of the people on the march – apart from a few drunk thugs – thought they were doing a good thing. They have been fed so many lies and half truths by Anderson and countless news and social medial outlets – often funded by shady ultra right wing sources – that they feel themselves to be the good guys in the face of some kind of liberal conspiracy. One sign being waved on the march read ‘Not far right, just concerned’.

The idea that the ‘hoards’ of young men ‘flooding’ into the country via the small boats constitute an existential threat to our country, particularly to our young women, has been pushed relentlessly via outlets such as GB news. This exchange is rather instructive;

The thing is, this is not new.

A certain kind of politics has ALWAYS sought to portray ‘the other’ as ‘the problem’. We know this of course, but yet it works anyway. The question I find myself asking is WHY does it work? How are we so easily taken in?

The answer is partly to do with fear. Firstly the fear of the black and brown outsider, secondly the great fear of those who already feel left behind and excluded of someone else replacing them, getting hold of those things that are scarce and almost out of reach. Housing, the NHS, benefits, jobs, education- exactly the themes that much of the narrative on GB news cycles through over and over again. They know that if people who feel already disadvantaged are presented with information that others are getting what they can not have for free, this will create a reaction – whether or not it is true.

I will not link to any of the news articles or videos, but you do not have to look hard to find articles and social media videos with titles like ‘Immigration is obliterating our communities’. It is all the same fear mongering, targetted at people who already feel excluded and worried about their futures. It is like spraying petrol at a hundred candles. Most commentators feel that this will inevitably lead to violence.

There is more though – for this to be believable, Anderson, Farage and their chums on GB news need ‘experts’ who can back up their outrageous claims with ‘research’ and apparently informed opinion. Much of this is filtered through so called ‘think tanks’ of the Tupton street variety.

The point of this piece though was to connect this post with the one I wrote yesterday. Ther report in The Guardian revealing the work to understand the links to racism and slavery at Edinburgh University.

Today, another article concerned itself with information released about the use by the far right of long ago discredited pseudo-science such as Phrenology and Eugenics.

The advent of modern genetics and human population data has shattered the idea that there are biologically distinct groups, or that humans that can be neatly categorised based on skin colour or external appearance. Genetic variation between populations is continuous and does not align with social, historical and cultural constructs of race. Race, as a genetic concept, does not exist.

Yet, says Angela Saini, author of a book on the return of race science, “people don’t stop believing falsehoods just because the evidence suggests they are wrong”. As IQ testing became the metric of choice for those seeking to draw conclusions about racial differences – often based on biased or fraudulent datasets – old, discredited arguments resurfaced.

In other words, the ways our Empire ancestors justified conquest and colonisation are still being used to justify the ‘othering’ and dehumanising of black and brown people – this time to gain political advantage.

With the recent rise in ethnic nationalism and the far right globally, a resurgence of interest is under way into theories of racial exceptionalism. Last year, the Guardian revealed that an international network of “race science” activists, backed by secret funding from a US tech entrepreneur, had been seeking to influence public debate. Discredited ideas on race, genetics and IQ have become staple topics of far-right online discourse.

“The ideas have absolutely not changed at all,” says Prof Rebecca Sear, an anthropologist at Brunel University of London and president of the European Human Behaviour and Evolution Association. “If you can provide a measurement – IQ, skull size – that helps give racism a respectable gloss.”

I had a conversation with a dear friend recently about how we might approach information or facts on some of this material. I suggested to her that the word ‘hermaneutic’ is important. (There is more about the word here.)

We look at everything through a set of goggles – most of the time ones we don’t even know what we are wearing. This means that how we read things is distorted in ways that we are often only partially aware of.

It also means that information that we (and others) give out – including this blog – is shaped by the hermaneutic of the person or organisation that provided it. In this case, it then becomes important to try to understand this as a means of understanding what is being sold. Facts are dangerous things, easy to use in ways demanded by a particular hermaneutic. If we can understand the nature of that hermaneutic, then perhaps this might enable some compensational caution when these facts become too convenient for a partucular narrative- particularly when this create victims out of victims and suits the ends of people who already have too much power.

Earthling

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

I played cricket yesterday. It was the first match of the season, which we won, despite dropping at least 15 catches (I have a black finger of shame) and enjoying many comedy moments. So it was, stiff and sore, that I ventured into the garden early this morning to attend my ‘church’.

The birds sang hymns.

Deer in the thicket were present but unseen like the Holy Ghost.

I planted onion sets like one might lay down gifts at the altar.

I wove and tied up live willow as if wrestling with theology.

I mark my blessings one by one. No matter what may unfold in the future, I count this day – its beauty, it’s promised companionship and the health I now enjoy – as a gift I should treasure…

…and it all made me think about the earth that sustains us. The community that carries us. The inter-relatedness of everything…

…and the spirit (that I sometimes call god) who holds it all together – or perhaps it would be better to say ‘who loves it all by becoming what s/he loves’

And I wrote this…

Earthling

.

What do we mean when we say ‘Earth’?

Are we not formed from the same dirt?

Is the soil beneath our feet not alive?

Does it not squirm and churn

With sinew and stone, just

Like we do?

.

What do we mean when we say ‘Earth?’

This ball of half-cooled molten rock

Still sweating from creation condensation

Careening through unknown space

Perhaps still searching for home

Like we are

.

What do we mean when we say ‘Earth?’

Is it it, or is it us?

If it survives, must we first fall?

How much wounding can it mend?

Is it big, or is it small?

Like we are

.

What do we mean when we say ‘Earth?’

This womb that bore us

This tomb that buries us

This field that feeds us

If we should prick it, will it not bleed

Like we do?

Proost advent 19…

Today we have a poetry reading for you – with a difference. This one features a conversation with the poet who wrote the poem back on day 7, and then some stunning poetry from an old friend…

From the show notes for this pod;

“This episode features two Australian poets- Talitha Fraser and Stevie Wills, and is the first of what we hope to be a more regular immersion in poetry, and the story behind the poems.

Stevie lives with cerebral palsy which has affected her speech patterns, so listen carefully, because hers is a voice worth listening to! She speaks movingly about her long powerful poem which tells Mary’s story. It is a stunning piece that she was keen to allow to stand on its own. We recommend checking out her website to see/hear more of her work!

https://www.steviewills.com.au/

Talitha is a long term Proost person, having been a key part of previous poetry collection curation. She is active within feminist spaces and activism for indiginous rights in her adopted city of Melborne, although she was born in NZ. You can find out more about Talitha and her other projects here;

https://linktr.ee/the.recollective

The conversation in this chat was a privilege to be part of. We hope you enjoy it as much as we did.”

Oh America…

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Eight years ago, I wrote this, quoting Richard Rohr;

Our very suffering now, our crowded presence in this nest that we have largely fouled, will soon be the one thing that we finally share in common. It might be the one thing that will bring us together politically and religiously. The earth and its life systems, on which we all entirely depend, might soon become the very thing that will convert us to a simple lifestyle, to a necessary community, and to an inherent and natural sense of the Holy. We all breathe the same air and drink the same water. There are no Native, Hindu, Jewish, Christian, or Muslim versions of the universal elements. They are exactly the same for each of us.

It was an attempt to hold on to the idea that things would turn again towards good – in the wake of that first Trump victory in 2016. What I did not say in this post was that I wanted to be an active part of the resistance. I spent years writing and agitating, longing for better. Pleading for a world in which justice-making would push back the war mongers, the hate dealers and those who would exploit our human and non-human brothers and sisters for profit.

It almost seemed possible that the arc of history was turning. Trump lost. Bolsonaro lost. Johnson was toppled. But in a world of Starmer and Biden, any kind of radical shift was managed out of our expectations from the outset.

And now, the Mad King is back once more, vengeful in his dotage, full of fear and thunder, spewing lies and bombast, promising to prosecute an agenda that can only make things worse.

It feels like Nero, fiddling whilst Rome burns.

Perhaps this really is the fall towards the end of the civilisation we have known.

If so, this will not be the first time civilisations have fallen – in fact, they all must, eventually. You could even make a strong argument that would say ours is overdue. In his book Life After Doom: Wisdom and Courage for a World Falling Apart, writer Brian McLaren suggested that there were four possible future scenarios for our planet, based on current climate research- Collapse Avoidance, Collapse/Rebirth, Collapse/Survival, and Collapse/Extinction.

In Collapse/Avoidance, we heed the warning, take radical action, lower emissions, etc. The danger is, all we do is kick the can down the road for a further collapse in the future.

In Collapse/Rebirth we experience the pain of things falling apart – our lifestyles, our security, etc. and we finally wake up to the need to live differently on this planet. We consume less, throw less away, distribute more equally.

The other two outcomes I will leave to your own imagination.

Photo by Polina Zimmerman on Pexels.com

But I can not go back to that same place I found myself in 8 years ago.

I learned that if you spend too long in protest – eating only bitter seed out of a half empty bowl – then you will start to lose yourself. You are in danger of just picking at scabs till they leak.

This is not to say that we should not stand against injustice – of course not. But this is not enough. We must also live and love.

This poem has become increasingly important to me, so I offer it here in a format we have previously offered to our patreon feed. I hope our patreons will forgive me, but it feels very necessary just now….

Seatree patreon…

Photo by Monstera on Pexels.com

A few months ago, Michaela listened to one of those business webinar things aimed at small creative businesses, where they were talking about different ways for artists like us to make a living from what we create. The idea was that we could use Patreon as an exchange, in which people give monthly support in return for a sliding scale of content and ‘rewards’.

I confess, I was skeptical, but the reason we are still able to make a living through what we create is because Michaela works so hard to make it work so we gave it a whirl. To our (or mostly my) amazement, a number of people signed up.

This seems to me to be a miraculous and wonderful thing – that some people who I have never met would see something of value and beauty in what we make, so that they feel prepared to support us financially. Our lifestyle is nor lavish and so these small acts of support make a big difference.

How does it work? Well, check it out for yourself, here.The seatree patreon has four tiers, unlocked by different subscriptions, which include things like

  1. access to a private video of yours truly reading a poem
  2. a handwritten anotated poem
  3. a monthly gift
  4. a piece of seatree pottery each month.

The other thing I have discovered is how much I have enjoyed making these short videos. I hope our patreons will understand if I share one of these here as a sneak preview;